Open SpaceTM magazine
Check out the QEII Open Space magazine, March 2010 (PDF 2.5MB)
Download March 2010 articles:
Gisborne: Fencing a water catchment
Tararua: Replacing ineffective fencing
Covenants protecting Olearia shrubland and moths dependent on Olearia shrubs
Forest fragments: Objectives of restoration and management
Kaharoa Kokako: Amplifying New Zealand's original song
Find out more about Open Space magazine ....
Next issue: Late July 2010
Photos - recording change
By Geoff Walls
What makes Open Space Magazine appealing? Admit it, it’s the pictures! In any book on nature or history, no matter how well written, it’s the illustrations we’re most drawn to. Magazines, newspapers, TV, the cinema; all work because they’re graphic and they’re immediate. We’re mightily attracted by colour and shapes and have the imagination to match that curiosity. This makes photography a powerful and handy tool in conservation management. We can use it to document changes and to show the causes of change.
For decades I’ve observed and measured ecological changes in many sites around New Zealand. That’s my profession. I’ve made detailed site descriptions, measured vegetation plots, done bird counts and taken samples of wood, water, soil and rock. Good robust data-gathering and analysis; lots of meticulously written reports.
What’s made the difference though has been the photos I’ve taken, and I wish I’d known that earlier. Managers, planners, landowners, legal people, friends and family have all responded far more to my photos of places, plants, animals and people than to all my written and spoken evidence. Maybe I’m a pretty hopeless writer and speaker, but I don’t think it’s that. They’ve been able to get closer to the subject through the photos.
Anyone who’s watched a piece of bush, scrub, beach or wetland over the years can tell you that changes have taken place. Sometimes quite big changes. Perhaps the titoki has died back, lancewood has begun poking through the manuka, slips have healed, the pingao has gone or the raupo has expanded dramatically.
How often are there photos to show that though? Not often. Without them, we may have many good stories but little tangible evidence. To find out how effective conservation management has been, photography can provide a wealth of information quickly and cheaply. You don’t have to be a brilliant photographer or have expensive gear, but you do need to think about what you’re recording and why.
Photos 1 & 2 below: Forest interior at Big Bush, Chatham Island. In 1990 (Figure 1), sheep and cattle had free access and there was absolutely no undergrowth. In 1996 (Figure 2), after being fenced for only four years, there were saplings waist high. By 1999, when I last had a look, the undergrowth was taller than me and almost impenetrable.


Photo 3: The scratch marks on this totara tell us there’s something wrong in the forest: possums are numerous, probably damaging the canopy and ground cover alike.

Photo 4: Red mistletoe (Peraxilla tetrapetala), a highly sensitive ecological indicator, growing on a mountain beech in Kaweka Forest Park, Christmas 1998, and admired by my son Finn and his soft mate. I recorded the recovery of this plant from a chewed stub into a flourishing beauty within five years of the start of systematic possum control.
Even foliage within reach of deer wasn’t browsed, a sign that the hunters were effective in the area. The lack of open flowers indicated that the tui population was seriously low.

The most impressive evidence of change comes from photos taken from the same point but at different times. Regeneration on a forest floor or on a fenced-off hillside shows up within a few short years, as in the photos taken at Big Bush on the Chathams.
How I wish I’d set up such photopoints in our open space covenant on D’Urville Island. Then you’d believe me when I say the frightening thickets of stinging ongaonga in the bush gullies were totally replaced by kawakawa within 10 years, and that the present wind-combed blanket of manuka now covers what used to be bare eroding clay faces.
The causes of change, and the indicators of deterioration or recovery, can be photographed too. Possum bite-marks, deer-browsed tree bases, and the size and health of saplings and highly palatable plants such as mistletoes, succulent ferns and tree fuchsia, are excellent indicators.
Forest and wetland edges are where change is often fastest and most dramatic. Every open space covenant area has such signs and sites.
So get out your camera, find a place that’ll tell a story, nail a tag to the nearest strainer and take the picture that will show your grandchildren how it used to be.
Open SpaceTM Magazine No. 50, December 2000 © QEII National Trust
Back to covenant management information ....
Support QEII Trust
What's New
- Sir Brian Lochore thanks Nelson and Tasman covenantors
- 2010 QEII Athol Patterson Bursary awarded
- Landcare Research - your input requested on pest management
- New brochure: Protecting wetlands with QEII covenants
- Carbon credits
Kiwi at Tui Glen

Looking after kiwi at Tui Glen farm near Whangarei.
Find out more about this covenant.
Brochures
![]() |
Frequently asked questions about open space covenants |
![]() |
Assisting landowners to protect special features on their land Download PDF, 222KB |
![]() |
QEII covenants: Protecting and enhancing wetlands on private land |




.jpg)